Articles of confederation

Articles of confederation From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation did not provide the United States with an effective government. The remarkably weak central government provoked a hostile environment within the United States and led to the diminishing of the country politically and economically.Under the Articles of Confederation, tensions in the United States threatened peace and unity. With such a weak and powerless central government, the states acted as individual countries. Numerous states had no choice but to cede land to the federal government. This was the result of the inability of the states to control territories which were too spread out too far. In Document E, it is made apparent that New York had to yield most of its Midwest territory. In 1785, Massachusetts gave up parts of Michigan formally owned by New York four years earlier. If land was not ceded, war would have been a likely result between the states.The Articles of Conferderation, ratified in 1781. ...The Articles established a na tional legislature called the Congress, consisting of two to seven delegates from each state; each state had one vote, according to its size or population. No executive or judicial branches were provided for. Congress was charged with responsibility for conducting foreign relations, declaring war or peace, maintaining an army and navy, settling boundary disputes, establishing and maintaining a postal service, and variouslesser functions.Some of these responsibilities were shared with the states, and in one way or another Congress was dependent upon the cooperation of the states for carrying out any of them. Four visible weaknesses of the articles, apart from those of organization, made it impossible for Congress to execute its constitutional duties.These were analyzed in numbers 15-22 of The FEDERALIST, the political essays in which Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay argued the case for the U.S. CONSTITUTION...

Fascist Germany The Result of Instability essays

Fascist Germany The Result of Instability essays The 1930s were turbulent times in Germany's history. World War I had left the country in shambles and, as if that weren't enough, the people of Germany had been humiliated and stripped of their pride and dignity by the Allies. Germany's dream of becoming one of the strongest nations in the world no longer seemed to be a possibility and this caused resentment among the German people. It was clear that Germany needed some type of motivation to get itself back on its feet and this came in the form of a charismatic man, Adolf Hitler. Hitler, a man who knew what he wanted and would do anything to get it, single-handedly transformed a weary Germany into a deadly fascist state. In order to understand why exactly Hitler was able to make Germany a fascist state, we must study the effects that the end of World War I had on the country. Germany was left devastated and vulnerable at the end of the war. The Treaty of Versailles had left the country without a military and with a large debt that it just couldn't pay. Aside from that, it was forced to withdraw from its western territory where most of its coal and steel were located. This was a major implication for Germany because without these resources, it had no industrial growth (steel and coal are the forces behind industry), which meant that there was no money going into its economy. Without any economic development there was no way that Germany would be able to get out of debt. The Allies did not make any effort to help Germany during this time and left Germany to fend for itself (they seemed to be aware that this had been a mistake by the end World War II when they helped Japan out of its economic cri sis; this is an example of history influencing future actions). The "humiliation imposed by the victors in the World War I, coupled with the hardship of the stagnant economy," created bitterness and anger in Germany (Berlet 1). This is the reason that, when the Allies tried to est...

Gender Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 1

Gender - Essay Example Feminist theory embraced in totality the concept of the distinction between the concept of biological sex and the socio-cultural construct of gender. In the current conservative societal systems, the gender-biological sex distinction is strictly followed in specific contexts, especially the documents written by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the social sciences. Put differently in other contexts, including social science areas, gender is the basic inclusion of sexuality, or it replaces sexuality. Although the change in gender meaning is overly traced in the 1980s, a meager acceleration of gender context in the scientific field was liberally observed in 1993 in the United States. This is the period in which USA’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) began using the terminology gender instead of sex. Therefore, gender was reversely used during this period as a sexual view of individuals or as a person’s self-assessment and self-representation as male or female. Thi s paper, therefore, describes how individual social role players construct gender in a culture other than the ordinarily known cultures. Natural languages often make up all the gender distinctions. Gender relation and language may be of various kinds. Gender and language distinctions socially are more or less loosely associated with analogies of either perceived or actual differences between men and women. Some grammatical gender issues go far much beyond or totally ignore the masculine-feminine distinctions. In the explanation of gender and languages, the following are the key and elementary attributes of gender as a cultural construction concept. Firstly, languages include the terminologies used unequally while referring to men and women (Jowett, 2005). The conservative societal concern that the current language structures may be biased in favor of only

Criminal Procedure as Regards Arrest, Interrogation, and Essay

Criminal Procedure as Regards Arrest, Interrogation, and Identification Procedures - Essay Example In this paper, I will attempt to address not only how Miranda altered the balance of power between those accused of a crime and the need for police to do their jobs, but also how Miranda warnings could affect those with diminished mental capacity, and measures that could be taken to ensure complete understanding of guaranteed individual rights by anyone, regardless of their mental capacity. Response Paper Number Two: The Miranda Warnings as They Pertain to Criminal Procedure Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966): Helping the Accused While Hampering the Accuser The landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) set a new legal precedent, and the repercussions are still being felt today. The result of the decision in Miranda, 384 U.S. at 436 was that the confession of one Ernesto Miranda was declared by the United States Supreme Court to be inadmissible in his trial, due to the fact that Miranda had not been advised that he had the right to remain silent, or to have counsel present prior to making the confession. Because of this, according to the Fifth Amendment, which states, in part, that â€Å"No person shall†¦be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself†, his rights had been violated, and his confession was therefore inadmissible. Directly due to this, the conviction that had been originally found was reversed, and the case was sent back for a new trial. This decision by the United States Supreme Court, in considering the balance between abuse of individual rights and freedom for the innocent while allowing police to do their job in maintaining justice swung the balance powerfully in favor of those that stand accused of crimes, while negatively impacting the interests of the police in doing their job to put those who are guilty in prison. Miranda warnings are the same overall, no matter who receives them; they were designed that way to give a standard warning of rights that the accused was entitled to. The first se ntence states that the accused has â€Å"the right to remain silent† (Scheb & Scheb II, 2012). This means that as long as a person says absolutely nothing, unless the police have some form of hard evidence, they most likely cannot gain a conviction. Professor James Duane backs this up in the video lecture â€Å"Don’t Talk to Police† when he gives eight top reasons as to why no one, under any circumstances, should ever talk to the police. Chief among these reasons is that even if someone is innocent, something that is said, however innocent, even if it is the barest tidbit of information, could cause them to be accused or even convicted of a crime (Duane, 2008). That being said, again, as long as the accused remains silent, they retain the power of not only their right to do so but the power to hinder the police that are trying to convict them. The Miranda warnings also shifted power to the accused while negatively impacting police in their last statement, which states that the accused has â€Å"the right to an attorney; if you cannot afford one, one will be appointed for you† (Scheb & Scheb II, 2012). All that the accused has to do is to state that they wish an attorney, and the interrogation must cease

COLLEGE ALGEBRA-DISCUSSION BOARD Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

COLLEGE ALGEBRA-DISCUSSION BOARD - Essay Example Therefore e = 1 + 1/1 +  ½ + 1/3 +  ¼ †¦. Alternatively, e =1 + 1 + 1/ (1Ãâ€" 2) + 1/ (1 Ãâ€" 2 Ãâ€" 3) †¦. This makes e to have special characteristics that makes it a useful constant in mathematics. The first property of e is that it is a transcendental number. This implies that, e cannot be a root of any non-zero polynomial f (x) that has rational coefficients. Other useful mathematical constants are Ï€ and i. The number e has many uses that result directly from its characteristics. The number is useful in calculus where it is used to perform integral and differential operations that involve exponential functions. The number is of particular interest in indefinite integrals since it enables calculation of lower and upper bound for such integrals. The number is also applied in complex analysis as Euler’s identity. In this case cos x + i sin x = eix. In business arithmetic, the function is applied in the calculation of compound interest. Finally, the constant is applied in statistics to calculate Bernoulli

Manifest Destiny Essay Example for Free

Manifest Destiny Essay In the 1840s the United States increased its territory to stretch from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. This land was acquired through treaty, war, and negotiation. The opportunities of this large area of land offered in terms of resources and trade were great. The positive of M.D. do not outweigh the negative consequences. Manifest Destiny is a historic duty, in the 1800s the Americans believed that the manifest destiny of the United States was to expand to the Pacific Ocean. The United States started as costal colonies but eventually the fulfilled their manifest destiny and expanded buy conquering and purchasing land. The Americans gained more land by buying it from France in the Louisiana Purchase and they also acquired land by cession as they did in the Mexican Cession. Other ways of expanded their land was to take it by force; many settlers killed the Indians and stole their land from them. The Americans in the 1800s believed that it was the historic duty of their nation to expand to the Pacific Ocean. They believed that the land was rightfully theirs. They ignored the fact that the land was already occupied and began to move west. They did not recognize the Indians as people; they saw them as potential slaves, so they simply killed them and took their land. Much of the land was bought from France in the Louisiana Purchase, but other lands such as Texas, California and Oregon was not theirs. Using both military strength and negotiations, the US was determined to fulfill their historic duty. The main difference between the border issues of Oregon and Texas is the way these issues were settled. The Texas issue resulted in a war with Mexico, which gained land and lost soldiers. However, this did allow the US to gain more land than just Texas. The Oregon issue, on the other hand, was more peaceful. The US negotiated and made a treaty with Britain instead of going to war with them. However, both these issues were different ways the US gained land and expanded their nation.

Phaedo and the Qualities of Being Dead and Being Alive

Phaedo and the Qualities of Being Dead and Being Alive Dru Espinosa   In the dialogue, The Phaedo, Plato gives an account of the final moments of Socrates. Several arguments are presented and discussed. These arguments regard the immortality of the soul and reincarnation. In this essay I will present a brief summary of the dialogue, explain one of the arguments presented in it, and finally show why the argument fails to prove the notion of reincarnation. The Phaedo is a Socratic dialogue written by the philosopher Plato. The dialogue gives an account of the final hours of Socrates and his conversations from the viewpoint of a bystander. Several arguments are presented and discussed in The Phaedo, in addition to these a myth concerning the afterlife is presented by Socrates. The main arguments from The Phaedo are the argument from opposites, the argument from recollection, the argument from affinities, and a fourth argument concerning the difference between corporeal and incorporeal things. These arguments aim at proving the immortality of the soul, and also attempt to prove the Pythagorean conception of reincarnation. The myth presented near the closing of the dialogue concerns the terminus of the soul, which depends on how pure or corrupt it is at death. The dramatic death of Socrates concludes the dialogue. The argument from opposites claims that the soul is reincarnated. It lies on the principle that things transition from two opposites in a cycle. Before something becomes small, it was large, for it could not have been small before it became small. Moreover, if things only became smaller, and not larger, eventually everything would be miniscule. And if it was the other way around, where everything only became larger, and not smaller, everything would eventually be one thing, because everything would have joined together. If this were the case then we would notice that things only become smaller, shorter, or uglier, and never their opposites, or vice versa. Socrates shows that things do transition from two opposites, by referencing to observable examples. He contrasts this to death, and claims that there has to be a cycle of becoming alive and becoming dead, or else everything would become dead, or vice versa. The analogies that Socrates uses are applicable to every corporeal thing in the universe. Everything is either large or small, tall or short, etcetera. He claims that there is a process of becoming from its opposite (e.g. something becoming larger from being small), and that this process is cyclical. For if everything only became larger, but not smaller, then eventually everything would be conjoined together into one large thing. Consequently, if everything only became smaller, then eventually everything would be miniscule. Life and death, however, are not qualities in which everything is either one or the other. For to be dead it is necessary that the thing was once alive. Not everything in the universe was once alive, nor is currently alive. Thus, not everything is either dead or alive. This is how the qualities of being dead and being alive differ than the qualities of small and large. It follows then, since the process of becoming dead or alive is not applicable to everything, th at it cannot be said that all things would become one if all living things were to only die. Moreover, Socrates cannot point to any examples in which a soul comes back to life from death, as he can show something becoming short from its opposite. In this essay I have given a summary of the dialogue, explained the argument from opposites, and showed why it fails to prove the reincarnation of the soul. I have done this by showing that the qualities of living and being dead are different from other universal qualities in that they are only applicable to a small portion of the universe, and the consequent of this is that the universe would not become one, if things which were once alive never become alive again. I also showed that Socrates cannot reference an example of a soul switching between the opposites of life and death as he can other qualities. Therefore, the argument from opposites fails to prove the notion of reincarnation.